to unite on a simple, honest
reading of the plain meaning of
the text,
WITHOUT creeds,
theological systems, or denominational biases
obscuring the obvious
commands examples, and necessary inferences of the New
Testament.
PROPHESING
OF THE FLOOD OF ATTACKS IN THE LAST DAYS.
By using RACA
words on the Historic Church of Christ of
which He is the HEAD or only Teacher, Keith
Stanglin and ALL Theologians poke fun of
Jesus for pretending that the Prophets spoke
of Him. That's fine. That's the MARK
of Music and Rhetoric and the BEAST.
John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and
said,
My DOCTRINE is
not mine, but his that sent me.
John 7:17 If any man will do his will,
he shall
know of the DOCTRINE
whether
it be of God, or whether I SPEAK of
myself.
John 8:26 I have many
things to say and to judge of you:
but
he that sent me is true;
and
I SPEAK
to the world those things
which I have HEARD
of him.
John 8:27 They understood not that he
spake to them of the Father.
John 8:28 Then said Jesus unto them,
When
ye have lifted up the Son of man,
then
shall ye know that I am he,
and
that I do nothing of myself;
but
as my Father hath taught me,
I SPEAK
these things.
John 8:29 And he that sent me is with me:
the
Father hath not left me alone;
for I DO always those
things that PLEASE him.
John 8:30 As he spake these WORDS, many
believed on him.
John 8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews
which believed on him,
IF
ye continue in my WORD,
THEN are ye
my DISCIPLE indeed;
John 17:6 I have manifested thy name unto the
men which thou gavest me OUT of the WORLD:
thine
they were, and thou gavest them me; and they
have KEPT THY WORD
John 17:7 Now they have known that all things
whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee.
John 17:8 For I have given unto them the WORDS
which thou gavest me;
and they
have received them,
and have
known surely that I came out from thee,
and they
have believed that thou didst send me.
John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and
said,
My DOCTRINE is
not mine, but his that sent me.
John 7:17 If any man will do his will,
he shall
know of the DOCTRINE
whether
it be of God, or whether I SPEAK of
myself.
John 7:18 He that SPEAKETH
of HIMSELF seeketh his OWN
glory: [Or sends
out a flood of self-speak books]
but he
that seeketh his glory that sent him,
the
same is true, and no unrighteousness is in
him.
John 17:8 For I have given
unto them the WORDS
which THOU gavest me;
and they have
received them,
and have known
surely that I came out from thee,
and they have
believed that thou didst send me.
John
17:11 And now I am no more in the world, but
these are in the world, and I come to thee.
Holy
Father, keep through thine own name those whom
thou hast given me,
That
they may be ONE,
as we are.
John 17:12 While I was with them in the world,
I kept them in thy name:
those
that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of
them is lost,
but the
son of perdition; that the scripture might be
fulfilled.
Judas is on
the left. The Thief's bag was attached
to the case for carrying his double flood.
The bag proves that Judas was an agent of
the Kosmokrater.
d
No one enjoys
a self centered person speaking OF HIMSELF
and unable to SPEAK that which is WRITTEN
for our LEARNING. Learning is the ONE
PIECE PATTERN and in the Synagogue even a
schooboy could follow the PATTERN of Jesus
to STAND UP AND READ and then decently and
in order SIT DOWN PLEASE. Jesus went
ON THE ROAD to Preach.
John 17:13 And now come I to thee;
and these things I speak in the world,
that
they might have my joy fulfilled in
themselves.
John 17:14 I have given them thy WORD; and the
world hath hated them,
because
they are NOT OF the world, even as I
am not of the world.
John 17:15 I pray not that thou shouldest take
them out of the world,
but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
John 17:16 They are not of the world, even as
I am not of the world.
JESUS
WAS SENT FOR A SMALL BAND OF LOST SPIRITS. IN ISAIAH
JESUS WOULD PROVIDE A COVERT OR UMBRELLA SO THAT
THIS FEARFUL BAND ATTENDED SCHOOL 'AT THE CORNER' OR
SECRET PLACE "OUTSIDE THE CAMP" TO "LEARN OF ME."
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT ALL OF THOSE SIMONIZED TO CONTROL
WORSHIP SERVICES REPUDIATE JESUS.
As
the ANTITHES of the universal pagan TRIAD gods of
father, mother (spirit) and dominant and perverse
little son (Horus), Holy Scripture makes it clear
that God wanted HIMself known as a singular,
sacrificial God.
SPIRIT
is figurative or a PARABLE to Hide from the wise or
sophists (rhetoricians, singers, Instrument players)
Matt.
28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying,
ALL
POWER is given
unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matt. 28:19 *GO ye therefore, and *TEACH all nations,
them in
the name [singular] of the Father, and of the Son,
and of the Holy Ghost:
Matt. 28:20 *Teaching
them to observe all things whatsoever I
have commanded you:
and, lo,
I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world
[Messianic age]. Amen.
Rom. 10:15 And
how shall they preach, EXCEPT
THEY BE SENT?
as it is
written, How beautiful are the feet of them that
preach the GOSPEL of peace,
and bring glad
tidings of good things!
A Preacher is a HERALD: He takes a sealed
message to the commander in the field: He cannot open
it, change it or CHARGE for it on the receiving end.
Keith
Stanglin: This CONCEIT has been
thoroughly illuminated and critiqued in the last
fifty years (bibliography available on
request), so I won’t belabor it here.
CONCEIT
"too much pride in your own worth or goodness."
That
is fabrication: When you follow the
pattern of all historic submissive writers, they
obey the command in Isaiah 55 by the Spirit OF God
and do not SEEK YOUR OWN PLEASURE or SPEAK YOUR OWN
WORDS that is the opposite of conceit. Terminal
conceit is claiming to EXPLAIN the Scriptures
because neither Father, Son nor inspired WRITERS
knew how.
This approach has
proven to be naive, mistaken, and
counterproductive. Its failure is at the root
of the ongoing crisis of identity that dogs Churches
of Christ.
Paul
claimed worship IN THE SPIRIT and not IN
THE FLESH to hide from the DOGS. Those who
suddenly saw visions and heard voices actively
promote homosexuals (dogs) in the pulpit. This
began at the APPOINTED time and built to a CLIMAX
(wimber-fuller) created by music.
Jeanene.Reese.LGBT.MUST.be.Included.html
Head of a Bible Department Exposed
Rubel.Shelly.New.Wineskins.Effeminate.Worship
http://www.pineycom.com/Shelly-York-Narrative.html
Rubel Shelly and John York: Rubel: Let me give you an example to work with in relation to the
question you've raised: homosexuality and the ordination of practicing homosexuals to
ministry.
Why don't we at least entertain the
possibility that the Bible simply reflects an ANCIENT TABOO or homophobic prejudice in a few people like
Paul -- a taboo and
prejudice we need to outgrow?
Here
is what Keith Stanglin is boasting of as LATTER DAY
superiority of God Who could not reveal His will
BEFORE ME age.
Where are they today?
Originally part of the
Restoration Movement (begun by Thomas and Alexander
Campbell, Barton W. Stone and others), the Disciples
of Christ adopted a denominational structure and
created Christian Missionary Fellowship in the late
1800s, thus "abandoning" the "non-denominational"
principle of the Movement.
In recent years
(1970s following), the Disciples of Christ denomination has sought to broaden
its "liberality" and has endorsed the following
anti-Biblical positions:
1. homosexual marriages
2. ordained
women ministers
3.
ordained women elders
4. denied the requirement of immersion for salvation
[neo-Calvinism]
5. denied the virgin birth of Jesus (The
"incarnational" theory does this. Rubel Shelly
compares Mary to Cherokee Sall, the mine
prostitute.)
Shelly and York used the
word SHAME of Mary 13 times.
6. participated with other liberal
denominations in undermining the accuracy and
authenticity of the Bible.
7. participated in
unity discussions with the Roman Catholic church,
apparently acknowledging the latter's claims and
doctrines.
"But it was
right and important for the Assembly to defeat
this resolution because Scripture is not the highest
authority:
"Scripture in
tension with reason, experience and tradition under the tutelage of the
Holy Spirit is our highest
authority!
"All must be
kept in creative tension with each other if
we are to understand the truth about God and,
thus, about ourselves.
Jesus,
according to the Narrative Theologians, was also
conceited.
Keith
Stanglin has fed himself by claiming the right to be
paid by poor widows. It is of COSMIC
proportions to pretend to belong to any group and
follow the Jude prophecied pattern of INFILTRATING.
Jude says that such people are FOREORDAINED.
Jesus says that they are OF the World, the historic
Ecumenical, the kingdom of Satan. They are
defined as BEASTS and made of DUST. For students of
Scripture, that means that Adam was an ABORIGINE
whom God gave him a SOUL
Logos
computation, reckoning
2. statement of a theory,
argument, ouk emeu alla tou l. akousantas
prob. in Heraclit.50;
logon ēde noēma amphis alētheiēs discourse
and reflection on reality, discourse
and reflection on reality,
IV. inward debate of
the soul, reflection, deliberation
Regulative and formative forces,
derived from the intelligible and operative
in the sensible universe,
Opposite to epithumia
A. desire,
yearning, longing after a thing, desire
of or for it, Theaomai :--gaze
at, behold, mostly with a sense of wonder, 3.
view as spectators
Opposite
Pathos
A. that which happens to a person
or thing, incident, accident,
Opposite
Poiein to
excite passion, Arist.Rh.1418a12;
V. Rhet., emotional style
or treatment,Opposite
Enthousi-astikos
, ē, on, A. inspired,
“phusis” Pl.Ti.71e;
esp. by music,
Prose, OPPOSITE -poiêsis,
Id.R.390a;
OPPOSITE -
poiêtikê, D.H.
Comp.6;
opp.
poiêmata,
onomatopoeic word
OPPOSITE
emmetra Modus
2. The measure of tones, measure, rhythm,
melody, harmony, time; in poetry,
measure,
metre, mode:
Mūsĭcus a, um, adj., =
mousikos.
X. the
Word or
Wisdom of
God, personified as his agent in creation and
world-government,
347c] But if he does not mind, let us talk
no more of poems and verses, but consider
the points on which I questioned you at first,
Protagoras, and on which I should be glad to
reach, with your help, a conclusion.
For it seems to me that
arguing about poetry is comparable to the
wine-parties of common market-folk.
These people, owing to their inability to
carry on a familiar conversation over their
wine by means of their own voices and discussions