DON'T
EXPECT JOHN CALVIN AND
REAL MEN TO JOIN YOU IN THE DANCE1
Calvin
in Harmony of the Law
speaks of the SYNAGOGUE which was the "church in the wilderness"
which OUTLAWED music.
But
when the congregation is to
be gathered together, ye shall blow, but ye shall not sound an alarm. Numbers 10:7
"For
this office, to which they
were appointed, was no servile one, as that they should blow the
trumpets at the command of others; but rather did God thus set them
over public affairs,
that
the people
might not tumultuously
call
their assemblies
in the blindness and precipitation
of passion, but rather
that modesty, gravity,
and moderation should be observed in
them.
"We
know how often in earthly
affairs God is not
regarded, but counsels are confidently
discussed without
reference to
His word. He testified,
therefore, by this employment of the priests,
that
all
assemblies, except those
in which He should preside, were accursed.
"Profane nations also had their ceremonies, such as auguries, supplications, soothsayings, victims, because
natural reason dictated that
nothing could be engaged in successfully without Divine assistance;
but
God would have
His people bound to Him in another way, so that, when called by the sound
of the sacred
trumpets as by a voice
from
heaven,
they
should assemble to holy and pious deliberations. The circumstance of
the place also has the same
object.
The
door of the Tabernacle was
to them, as if they placed themselves in the sight; of God.
We
will speak of
the word dewm, mogned
(synagogue)
elsewhere.
Although it signifies an appointed
time, or
place,
and also an assembly of the people, I prefer
translating it
convention, because God
there in a solemn manner,
as
if before His sacred
tribunal, called the people to witness,
or, according to
appointment, proceeded to make a
covenant with them.
God
made a LAW against
instruments for the SYNAGOGUE. And no Jew was dumb enough to violate
that until the year ad 1815.
Of
the trumpet
playing not allowed for the assembly, he notes:
Thus
Malvenda in
Poole's Syn., "et clangetis taratantara." The word is used by
Ennius "At tuba terribili
sonitu taratantara dixit." -- Serv. in, AEn, 4. A.V.,
"an
alarm."
"But
the trumpet sounded with
its terrible
taratantara." Ennius
(Q. Ennius)
- Moribus
antiquis res stat Romana virisque
- On
ancient ways and heroes stands the Roman state
- O
Tite tute Tati tibi tanta, tyranne, tulisti
- Oh,
you tyrant, Titus Tatius! You took such great things for yourself
Quintus
Ennius (239 BC-169 BC) epic poet, dramatist, and satirist, the most
influential of the early Latin poets, rightly called the founder of
Roman literature. His epic Annales, a narrative poem telling the story
of Rome from the wanderings of Aeneas to the poet's own day, was the
national epic until it was eclipsed by Virgil's Aeneid.
"The
hatsotserah, or straight trumpet (Ps. 98:6; Num. 10:1-10). This name is
supposed by some to be an onomatopoetic word, intended to imitate the
pulse-like sound of the trumpet, like the Latin taratantara. Some have identified
it with the modern
trombone."h
As
Martin Luther
notes:
But
as our would-be wise, new
spirits assert that faith
alone saves, and that
works
and external things avail
nothing, we answer:
It
is true, indeed,
that nothing in
us
is of any avail but faith, as we shall
hear still further. But these blind guides are unwilling to see this,
namely,
that faith must have
something which it believes,
that is, of which it takes
hold, and upon which it stands
and rests.
Thus faith
clings to the
water,
and believes
that it is Baptism, in which there is pure salvation and life;
not
through the
water (as we have sufficiently stated), but through the fact that it
is embodied
in the Word
and institution of God,
and the name of God
inheres in it.
Now,
if I believe this, what
else is it than believing in God as in Him who has given and planted
His Word into this ordinance, and proposes to us this external thing
wherein we may apprehend such a treasure? Martin
Luther
"Like most religious
reformers, Calvin relied
on song by the people, and discourages
musical instruments which he
compared to childish
toys which ought
to be put away in
manhood. So deeply did his teaching sink into the Genevans, that
three years after his death they melted down
the pipes of the organ in his
church, to form
flagons for the communion. And his
principle were adopted widely in
Britain." (W.
T. Whitley,
Congregational Hymn-Singing (London: J. M.
Dent &
Sons Ltd., 1933, p. 58).
"To sing the praises of God
upon the harp and
psaltery," says Calvin, "unquestionably formed a
part of the training
of the law and of the service of God under that dispensation of shadows
and figures,
but they are not
now to be used
in public thanksgiving."
(On Ps. lxxi. 22)
4639. skia,
skee´-ah;
apparently a primary word; “shade” or a shadow (literally or
figuratively (darkness of error or an adumbration)):
shadow.
He says again: "With respect
to the tabret,
harp, and psaltery,
we have formerly observed, and will find it necessary afterwards to
repeat the same remark,
that the Levites,
under the law,
were justified in making use of instrumental music in the worship of
God;
it having been his will
to train
his people, while they were yet tender and like children, by such
rudiments until the coming of Christ.
But now, when the clear
light of the gospel has dissipated
the shadows of
the law and
taught
us that God is to be served in a simpler form,
it would be to
act a foolish and
mistaken part to imitate that which the prophet enjoined only upon
those of his own time." (On Ps. lxxxi. 3.)
He further observes: "We are
to remember that
the worship of God was never
understood to
consist in such outward
services, which
were only necessary to help forward a
people as
yet weak and rude in knowledge in the spiritual worship of God.
[John
Calvin Worship: Nor from the beginning was there any other
method of
worshipping God, the only difference being, that this spiritual truth, which with us is naked and simple,
was
under the
former dispensation wrapped up in figures.
And this is the
meaning of our Saviour's words,
"The hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship
the Father in spirit
and in truth"
(John 4:23).
For
by these words he meant not
to declare that God was not worshipped by the fathers in this
spiritual manner, but only to point out a distinction in the external form:
that is, that while they had the Spirit shadowed
forth by many figures,
we have it in simplicity.
But
it has always
been an acknowledged point, that God, who is
a Spirit, must be worshipped in spirit and in truth.]
A difference is to be
observed in this respect
between his people under the Old and under the New Testament; for now
that Christ has appeared, and the church has reached full age,
it were only to bury
the light of the gospel
should we introduce
the
shadows of a departed dispensation.
From this it
appears that the Papists, as I shall have occasion to show elsewhere,
in employing instrumental
music cannot be
said so much to imitate
the practice of God's ancient people as to
Psalm
78: it in a
sense less and
absurd
manner,
exhibiting a silly
delight in that
worship of the Old
Testament which was figurative and terminated
with the gospel." (On Ps. xcii. 1.)
John
Calvin understood
"Dispensational Distinctions" as well as the place of music in the
Law period under the monarchy of kings rather than of God.
"There
is then no
other
argument needed to condemn
superstitions, than
that they are not
commanded by God:
for when men allow themselves to worship God according to their own fancies, and attend not to His
commands, they pervert true religion."
Calvin's Commentaries,
9:414.
He
continues:
"Hebrews
9:1. "Then
verily the first",
&c. After having spoken generally of the abrogation of the old
covenant, he now refers
specially to the ceremonies.
His
object is to
show that
there was nothing practiced then to which
Christ's coming has
not put an
end.
He
says first, that under
the old
covenant there was a specific
form of divine
worship, and that it
was peculiarly adapted to that time. It will hereafter appear by the
comparison what kind of things were those rituals prescribed under
the Law.
"Were
any one to ask why the
Apostle speaks with so little respect and even with contempt of Sacraments
divinely
instituted, and
extenuates their efficacy? This he
does, because he
separates them from Christ;
and we know that when
viewed in themselves they are
but beggarly
elements, as Paul calls
them. (Gal. 4: 9.)
Because
the music in connection with
animal sacrifices under the Law
were part of a training or disciplinary system, John Calvin
understands the difference
between the Old Law and the New Covenant
Then
Calvin notes what the
Catholics confess: that it was not really a borrowing from the
sacrificial system but from the world of entertainment from all
pagans:
"From
this it
appears that the Papists, as I shall have occasion to show elsewhere,
in employing instrumental
music
cannot
be said so
much to imitate the practice of God's ancient people as to ape it in a senseless and absurd manner,
exhibiting a silly delight in that worship of the Old Testament which was figurative
and terminated
with the gospel." (Psalm 92:1)
"We
need not shrink from
admitting that candles, like incense
and lustral water, were commonly employed in pagan worship and in the rites paid to the dead. But the Church from a
very early period took them
into her service, just as she adopted many other things indifferent
in themselves, which seemed proper to enhance
the splendour of religious
ceremonial. We must not
forget
that most of these adjuncts to
worship, like music,
lights, perfumes, ablutions, floral decorations, canopies, fans,
screens, bells, vestments, etc.
were
not identified
with any idolatrous cult in particular;
they were common to almost all cults.
They are, in fact, part of the natural language of mystical
expression, and such things belong quite as much to secular
ceremonial as they do to religion. Catholic
Encyclopedia on Candles
Of
Psalm
71:22.
We are not,
indeed, forbidden to
use, in private,
musical instruments, but they are banished out of the
churches by the plain
command of the Holy
Spirit, when Paul, in 1 Corinthians 14:13, lays it down as an
invariable rule, that we must praise God,
and pray to him only
in a known tongue.
By the word of
truth,
the Psalmist
means that the hope which he reposed in God was rewarded, when God
preserved him in the midst of dangers.
[Note:
Paul
connects speaking in tongues and musical instruments which are only
useful for signalling in warfare if you interpret the message before
you sound it]
The promises
of God, and his
truth in performing them, are inseparably joined together.
Unless we depend upon the word of God, all the benefits which
he confers upon us will be
unsavoury or tasteless to us;
nor
will we ever be
stirred up either to prayer or thanksgiving,
if we are not
previously illuminated
by the Divine word.
So
much the more revolting,
then, is the folly of that diabolical man, Servetus, who teaches that
the rule of praying is perverted
as
if we could
have any access into the presence of God, until he first invited us
by his own voice to come to him.
Of Psalm 33 Calvin addressed both
the end of the legalistic
system and the use of instruments:
There
is a distinction,
however, to be observed here, that we may not
indiscriminately
consider as applicable to ourselves, every thing which was
formerly
enjoined upon the Jews.
I
have no doubt that playing upon cymbals, touching the harp and
the viol, and all that kind
of music, which is
so frequently mentioned in the Psalms,
was
a part of the education; that is to say, the puerile
instruction of the law: I speak of the stated service of the
temple.
puerīlis e, adj. with comp. puer, boyish, childish, youthful : puerili specie, senili prudentiā: tempus, O.: vox: regnum, L.: agmen, a troop of boys , V.:
(facies) in virgine, boyish , O.— Boyish,
childish, puerile, trivial, silly : acta res consilio puerili: inconstantia, T.: vota, O.: Si puerilius his ratio esse evincet amare, H.
inconstantĭa , ae, f. inconstans, I.
inconstancy, changeableness, fickleness
(class.).
I. Of persons: “
quid est inconstantia, mobilitate, levitate, cum singulis hominibus, tum vero universo senatui turpius?”
Cic. Phil. 7, 3, 9: “
levitate implicata,”
id. Vatin. 1, 3: “
fama inconstantiae,”
id. Fam. 1, 9: “
inconstantiae notam habere, Plin. ap. Trogas, 11, 52, 114, § 276: nemo doctus umquam mutationem consilii inconstantiam dixit esse,”
Cic. Att. 16, 7, 3;
id. N. D. 3, 14.—
Turpis I.ugly, unsightly,
unseemly, foul, filthy I. II.Transf.,
of
sound, disagreeable, cacophonous III.Trop.,
unseemly, shameful, disgraceful, base,
infamous, scandalous, dishonorable. Effemino
Effemino B. In mal. part., that
submits to unnatural lust: “pathicus,” Suet. Aug. 68; Auct. Priap. 58, 2; Vulg. 3 Reg. 14, 24 al.—Adv.:
effēmĭnāte , effeminately
Cicero Plancius
When no one knew what were the feelings of those men who by means of
their armies, and their arms, and their riches, were the most powerful
men in the state, then that voice, rendered insane by its infamous
debaucheries, made effeminate by its attendance on holy altars, kept
crying out in a most ferocious manner that both these men and the
consuls were acting in concert with him.
The whole equestrian order was with me; whom, indeed,
that dancing
consul of Catiline's used to frighten in the assemblies of the people
with menaces of proscription. All Italy was assembled, and terrified with
fear of civil war and devastation.
Infantilis
of or belonging to infants or little children Histrionalis of
or belonging to a stage-player, like an actor.
-Tacitus 1.16 This
was the beginning of demoralization among the troops, of
quarreling, of listening to the talk of every pestilent fellow, in
short, of craving for luxury and idleness and loathing discipline and
toil. In the camp was one Percennius,
who had once been a leader of one of the theatrical factions, then
became a common soldier, had a saucy tongue, and had learnt from his
applause of actors how to stir up a crowd. By working on ignorant
minds, which doubted as to what would be the terms of military service
after Augustus, this man gradually influenced them in conversations at
night or at nightfall, and when the better [p. 15] men had dispersed, he gathered round
him all the worst spirits.
[The
"people's" congregation
were quarantined from the temple when the trumpets signalled the
beginning of sacrifice. Only the civil-temple state sacrificed tens
of thousands of innocent animals as their TYPE of the future
sacrifice of Jesus Christ with the mocking music of the warrior
Levites whose service was "hard bondage."]
For
even now, if believers
choose to cheer
themselves with musical instruments, they should, I think,
make it their object not to dissever their
cheerfulness from the praises
of
God.
But
when they
frequent their sacred assemblies, musical instruments in celebrating the
praises of God would be no more
suitable than the burning
of incense, the lighting up of lamps, and the restoration of
the other shadows of the
law.
The
Papists,
therefore, have foolishly borrowed this, as well as many other
things, from the Jews.
Men
who are fond of outward
pomp may delight in that noise;
but
the simplicity
which God recommends to
us by the apostle is
far more pleasing to him. Paul allows us to bless God in the public
assembly of the saints only in a known tongue,
(1 Corinthians 14:16.)
The voice
of man, although not
understood by the
generality,
assuredly
excels all inanimate
instruments of
music;
and yet we see
what St Paul determines concerning speaking in an unknown
tongue.
[Paul uses the
terms lifeless instruments or carnal weapons]
What
shall we then say of
chanting, which fills the ears with nothing but an empty sound?
A
modern writer
agrees:
"At
a time when there is a
rising protest against monologous and therefore sometimes
monotonous 'one man
ministeries' in the churches, and when it is complained increasingly
that the preacher is one of the few remaining public figures whose
formal remarks allow no public interrogation or discussion (even
Presidents are subjected now to the discipline of public interview),
it is perhaps in order for the churches to look here in Corinthiasn
to their earliest structure (including interrogation and
challenge)... in place of the often dull and unprofitable responsive
readings before it and of some of the singing which seems to be
often, at the conscious or mental level at least,
low
level
glosolalia with instrumental accompaniment." (Fredreck Dale
Bruner, A Theology of
the Holy Spirit, p. 300)
Calvin
continues:
Does
any one
object, that music is very useful for awakening the minds of men and
moving their hearts? I own it;
but
we should
always take care that no corruption creep in, which might both defile
the pure worship
of God and involve men
in superstition. Moreover, since the
Holy Spirit
expressly warns us of this danger by the mouth of Paul,
to
proceed beyond what we are there warranted by him is not only, I must
say, unadvised zeal, but
wicked and perverse
obstinacy.
Again,
Calvin notes that: "We
know that our Lord Jesus Christ has appeared, and by His advent has abolished these legal
shadows.
Instrumental
music, we
therefore maintain, was only tolerated on account of the times and
the people, because
they were as boys,
as the sacred Scripture speaketh, whose condition required these puerile rudiments.
But
in gospel times
we must not have recourse to these unless we wish to destroy the
evangelical perfection and to obscure the meridian light which we
enjoy in Christ our Lord." (Calvin's Commentary on the Thirty-third
Psalm, and on 1 Sam. 18:1-9).
In
The Mode of obtaining the Grace of
Christ, Calvin
notes:
9. It is, however, to be
carefully observed,
that Christian
liberty is in
all its parts a spiritual
matter, the
whole force of which consists in giving
peace to
trembling consciences, whether
they are anxious and disquieted as to the forgiveness of sins, or as
to whether their imperfect works, polluted by the
infirmities of the flesh, are pleasing to God, or are perplexed as to
the use of things
indifferent.
It is, therefore, perversely interpreted by
those who use it as a cloak
for their
lusts,
that they may
licentiously abuse
the good gifts of God, or who think there
is no liberty unless it is used in the presence of men, and, accordingly, in using it pay no regard
to their weak brethren.
Under this head, the sins
of the present age
are more numerous. For there is scarcely any one whose means allow
him to live sumptuously,
who does not delight in
feasting,
and dress, and the luxurious grandeur of his house, who wishes not to
surpass his neighbor in every kind of delicacy, and does not plume
himself amazingly on his splendor.
And all these things are defended under the pretext of
Christian liberty.
They
say they are things
indifferent:
I admit
it, provided they are used
indifferently.
But when they are too
eagerly longed
for,
when they are proudly
boasted of, when
they are indulged
in luxurious
profusion, things which otherwise were in themselves
lawful are certainly defiled by these vices.
Paul makes an admirable
distinction in regard
to things indifferent:
"Unto the pure all things
are pure:
but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but
even their mind and conscience is defiled" (Tit. 1: 15.)
For why is a
woe pronounced
upon the rich who have received their consolation? (Luke 6: 24,) who
are full, who
laugh now, who
"lie upon beds of ivory and stretch themselves
upon their couches;" "join house to house," and "lay field to field;"
"and the harp
and the viol,
the
tabret
and pipe,
and wine,
are in their
feasts," (Amos 6: 6; Isa. 5: 8, 10.)
Certainly ivory and
gold, and riches, are the
good creatures of God, permitted, nay destined, by divine providence
for the use of man; nor was it ever forbidden to laugh, or to be full,
or
to add new
to old
and hereditary possessions, or to be
delighted with music,
or to drink wine.
This is true, but when
the means are
supplied to roll
and wallow in luxury, to intoxicate
the mind and
soul with present and be always
hunting
after new pleasures,
is very far
from a legitimate
use of the gifts of God.
Let them, therefore,
suppress immoderate
desire, immoderate profusion, vanity, and arrogance, that they may
use the gifts of God purely with a pure conscience. When their mind
is brought to this state of soberness, they will be
able to regulate the legitimate use.
On the other hand, when
this
moderation is wanting, even plebeian and ordinary delicacies are
excessive.
For it is a true saying,
that a haughty mind
often dwells in a coarse and homely
garb, while true
humility lurks under fine
linen
and purple. Let
every one then live in his own station, poorly or
moderately, or in splendor; but let all remember that the nourishment
which God gives is for life, not luxury, and
let them regard it as
the law of
Christian liberty, to learn with Paul in whatever state they are,
"therewith to be
content," to
know "both how to be abased," and "how to abound,"
"to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need,"
(Phil. 4: 11.)
In The Necessity of Reforming the Church (1543) Calvin wrote:
"In inveighing against ceremonies themselves, and also in abrogating a great part of them,
we confess that there is some
difference between us and the prophets. They inveighed against their
countrymen for confining the worship
of God to external ceremonies, but still
ceremonies which God himself
had instituted; we complain that the same honor is paid to
frivolities of man's devising.
They,
while
condemning superstition, left untouched a
multitude of ceremonies
which God had enjoined, and which were useful
and appropriate
to an age of
tutelage; our business has been to
correct numerous rites which had either crept in through oversight, or
been turned to
abuse and which, moreover, by no means accorded with the time.
For,
if we would not throw everything into
confusion,
we must never lose sight of the distinction
between the old and the
new
dispensations, and of the
fact that ceremonies, the
observance of which was useful under the law,
are now not only
superfluous, but vicious and absurd.
But
in regard to the former, it
is plain that
they
are destitute of authority from the
scriptures,
as well as of any approved
example of such
intercession;
while, as to the latter,
Paul
declares that
none can invoke
God,
save those who
have been taught by his
word to pray. On this
depends the confidence with which it becomes pious minds to be
actuated and imbued when they engage in prayer.
But is it not altogether
at variance with
reason that the ploughing oxen
should starve, and the lazy asses be fed?
They will say, however, that they serve at
the altar.
I answer, that the priests under the law deserved
maintenance, by
ministering at an altar;
but that, as Paul
declares, the case under the
New Testament is different.
And what are those altar
services, for which
they allege
that maintenance is due
to them? Forsooth,
that they may perform their masses and chant in churches, for
example,
partly labor to no
purpose,
and partly perpetrate
sacrilege,
thereby provoking the anger
of God. See for what it is that they are alimented at the public
expense!
Westminster
Confession of Faith CHAPTER
XXI
Of Religious
Worship, and the
Sabbath Day
I. The light of nature
showeth that there is a
God, who hath lordship and sovereignty over all, is good, and doth
good unto
all, and is therefore to be feared, loved, praised, called upon,
trusted in, and served, with all the heart, and with all the soul,
and with all the might.
But
the acceptable
way of worshiping the true God
is instituted by
himself,
and so limited by his own revealed will,
that he may not be worshiped according to the imaginations and devices
of men,
or
the suggestions
of
Satan,
under any visible representation,
or any other way not
prescribed in the Holy Scripture.
C.H. Spurgeon
once said, (cited in Christian History magazine, Vol. 5, No. 4). The church needing
reformation in
Calvin's day was the tradition-encrusted church
of Rome. Shortly after the Reformation, for those leaving Rome
behind, two streams became apparent.
One was the
stream of classical Protestant orthodoxy,
represented today by a handful of Gideons in their desktop
publishing winevats.
The other was the left
wing of the
Reformation - the anabaptist movement. In the early years, the
anabaptists were suffering
outsiders.
But today the anabaptist
church is the Establishment - an establishment governed by a chaos of traditions instead of biblical
worship.
Everywhere we look we
see
Christians approaching God with observances
in worship
which Calvin calls 'the random
offspring of their own brain.'"
Though this work is not an
elaborate systematic
presentation of the foundations of Christianity, such as Calvin's
Institutes, it has still been correctly acknowledged as one of the
most important documents of the Reformation.
Calvin here pleads the
cause
dearest to his heart before an assembly perhaps the most august that
Europe could have furnished in that day. It has been said that the
animated style used by Calvin in this work would not lose by
comparison with any thing in the celebrated "Dedication" prefixed to
his Institutes.
To this day, The
Necessity of Reforming the
Church remains a powerful weapon, both defensive and offensive, to
fight the contemporary battle for Protestantism - the everlasting
gospel of truth. Here, in our modern setting, we find the answers to
many of the vexing questions which continue to agitate the Church.
Reformation
Index
Musical
Worship
Index
Home
Page
Home... Apocalyptic... Apocryphal... Awakening... Baptism.....Caneridge... Church.... Colonial... Godhead.... MaxLucado... Lynn.Aderson... Musical
Worship... Preaching... Restoration... RubelShelly... Search Our
Site.. Tongues... Topical...
Counter added 11/21/04 2427
4.21.07 2160 9.10.09 6736