Furthermore,
the
Hebrew
word for Synagogue is:
Mowed (h4150) mo-ade'; (2
Chron. 8:13), mo-aw-daw'; from 3259; prop. an
appointment, i. e. a fixed time or season; spec. a festival; conventionally a
year; by implication, an assembly (as convened for a
definite purpose); technically the congregation; by
extension, the place of meeting; also a signal (as
appointed beforehand): - appointed (sign, time),
(place of, solemn) assembly, congregation, (set,
solemn) feast, (appointed, due) season, solemn
(-ity), synagogue, (set) time
(appointed)
We can really say
that any of the meetings either in the central
sanctuary of the state worship, or the people's meetings in their
villages was a synagogue
What is
authority?
Authority is normaly
defined in
terms of a task. For instance, the task of the
leaders of Israel was to teach the sacred writings. This could be in
sitting down, rising up, walking by the way or by
gathering in a building protected from the weather.
A privelege was prayer at any time
or any place. It did not need to be LED.
When few people knew the Word,
and there were few written documents available, the teaching task fell
into the hands of the Levitical tribe who primarily
taught the parents who, in turn, taught their family.
There simply is no mention made of children in the
Bible and in the early churches as part of a
ritualized service.
The word
"worship" has nothing to do with music or rituals. Rather, Jesus eleminated
the time and PLACE of the Jerusalem or Gerezim temples.
Instead, He said that God only seeks us in the place
of OUR SPIRIT or mind. In the Old testament taking
head depended on teachers.
Take heed in the plague of
leprosy, that thou observe diligently, and do
according to all that
the priests the Levites shall teach you:
as I
commanded them,
so ye shall observe to do. Deut 23:8
Then the king of
Assyria commanded, saying, Carry thither one of the
priests whom ye brought from thence; and let them go
and dwell there,
and let him teach them the
manner of the God of the land. 2 Kings 17:27
For a long time
Israel was without the true God, without a priest to teach and without the
law.
2 Chronicles 15:3
However, almost
from the beginning, the priestly class failed:
The
heads thereof judge for reward, and the
priests thereof teach for hire, and the
prophets thereof divine for money:
yet will they
lean upon the Lord, and say, Is not the Lord
among us? none evil can come upon us. Micah 3:11
As a result, people
arose within the villages who taught the Word of God
and led the people in prayer. This was the essence of
the Synagogue. By the time Jesus came, the entire
clergy was corrupt and murderous:
And he began to
teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many
things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and
after three days rise again. Mark 8:31
This is repeated
today as people begin to fail because the priests and diviners work for hire and
repudiate the Word of God and substitute "chicken
soup." Therefore, the people retire from the "central
temples" and begin to meet in homes. This is a
faithful reproduction of the move from
Temple-Sacrificial system to the home and the Word.
Synagogue, like
"church," has nothing to do with buildings and
originally nothing to do with organizations or
institutions. The word literally means an assembly or an appointed time or
place.
The primary tasks of
teaching the revealed Word and prayer was carried out
in assembled groups and therefore needed no new
authority.
Institutionalizing
the Synagogue
"Since the
Babylonian Jews were unable to participate in the
worship of the cultus as in former days, the exile
marked an important turning-point in their religious
developmemt. Open-air meetings by the Kabar
irrigation-canal replaced gatherings in the Temple
and its precincts, a non-sacrificial worship emphasized
confession, fasting, prayer, and the reading of the Law, and initial
improvisations were developed to the point
"where the
faithful community aimed at as great a spiritual differentation from the pagan Babylonians as was possible.
Remember that
Israel demanded the right to "worship like the
nations" and therefore their worship was much like
that which they were forced into in Babylon. By
seeing themselves as others saw them, the Jews were
essentially cured of idolatry while in captivity.
"With the
development of house-gatherings and the
increased importance attached to the knowledge and observance of the Torah, there
was laid the basis for subsequent
synagogue-worship, an institution that owes its
origin to the diligence of Ezekiel." (Harrison, R.
K., Introduction to the Old Testament, Eerdmans,
p.414).
"The
Synagogue-worship, developed by and after the
exile, largely substituted the book for the symbol, and thought for the sensuous or
object appeal" (Int Std. Bible Ency., Worship. p.
3111).
Most aware people
understand that the "church" has reverted to the "become as much
like the world as possible in the hopes of winning the
world to their collection plates." However, "church"
exists only where the difference is
clearly shown in teaching the Words of Christ in song
and sermon.
What about
singing and other "acts of worship?"
Social functions
such as singing were not in the synagogues but "at the places
of watering" and not during the "assembly" time.
Alfred Edersheim makes it clear: there was not a role
for "praising the Lord" or singing in a celebrative
sense in the synagogue. For this reason, there is no
evidence of a "praise" service in the New Testament
church.
No. This is not
the "hole in the donut." This is not God's oversight
which we must correct with secular like singing.
"Hallel, in Jewish ritual,
selection from the Psalms, chanted as part of the liturgy
during certain festivals. The more frequently used
selection includes Psalms 113-118 and is known as
the Egyptian Hallel, presumably because Psalm 114
begins, "When Israel went out of Egypt"
It is sung in synagogues on the first two days of Passover, on Shabuoth, on Sukkot, on each morning of
the eight days of Hanukkah, and at the close of the
Seder.
"The Hallel
through the generations, on specific occasions:
Pesachim 117a
"Hallel requires a full stomach and a satisfied
spirit: Taanis 25b-26a
The reading is beloved to the
people, and so they listen closely: Megillah 21b
"The Hallel as
an Institution of the Prophets, to use to pray for salvation from
danger: Pesachim 117a [2x] Saying the Hallel daily is
blasphemous: Shabbos 118b
For instance, Deborah dwelled under
palm tree to apply the Law. She was a Judge and not a worship leader.
Because of failed male leadership she had to become the warrior
chief of the nation.
And when they
celebrated her victory as a warrior the NIV translates:
the voice of the singers at the watering places. They recite the righteous acts of the LORD, the righteous acts of
his warriors in Israel. Then the people of the LORD
went down to the city gates. Judges 5:11NIV
Here is the Greek
word the NIV translates singers:
Chacac (h2686) khaw-tsats'; a
prim. root [comp. 2673 = split in half]; prop. to chop into, pierce or server; hence to
curtail, to distribute (into ranks); as
denom. from 2671, to shoot an arrow: - archer, * bands,
cut off in the midst.
Therefore, there is
nothing similar to singing or
musicians in this passage. The KJv reads:
They that are
delivered from the noise of archers in the places of drawing
water,
there shall they rehearse the righteous acts of the
Lord,
even the righteous acts toward the inhabitants of
his villages in Israel: then shall the people of the
Lord go down to the gates. Judges 5:11KJV
"At the sound of
those who divide flocks among the watering
places, There they shall recount the righteous deeds
of the Lord, The righteous deeds for His peasantry
in Israel. Then the people of the Lord went down to
the gates. Judges 5:11NAS
All words related
to "music" or instruments have the same roots in a
destructive practice. For instance, to praise David
meant that they ridiculed Saul and drove a wedge
between the friendship.
The word psallo in
Greek is related to singing with instruments in its
original meaning. The word is related to the twanging of
bowstrings to send a "singing" arrow to pierce
the literal heart. The word is also related to the
SOP Jesus fed Judas as a supernatural sign.
Jesus condemed
praise as saying "Lord, Lord" and therefore praise
always had an object. For instance, the Jews praised
God by telling others how He saved the people at the
Red Sea. God explicitly condemns the prophesiers
(singers, chanters, deliverers of messages) because
HIS Word was not in them.
Praising God or
often the military leader was something done at any
time or place but ritualized praise would embarass
most humans. Albert Barnes notes of the daily rituals
of Israel:
"An artificial, effeminate music which should
relax the soul, frittering the melody, and displacing the power and majesty
of divine harmony by tricks of art, and giddy,
thoughtless, heartless, souless versifying would be
meet company." (Barnes, Albert, Amos, p. 303).
"Jingling,
banging, and rattling accompanied heathen cults, and the frenzying
shawms of a dozen ecstatic cries intoxicated the
masses. Amid this euphoric farewell feast of a dying
civilization, the voices of nonconformists were
emerging from places of Jewish and early Christian
worship; Philo of Alexandria had already emphasized
the ethical qualities of music, spurning the 'effeminate' art of his Gentile
surroundings.
Similarly, early
synagogue song intentionally foregoes artistic
perfection, renounces the playing of
instruments,
and attaches itself
entirely to 'the word'--the TEXT of the
Bible" (Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1971
ed., s.v. "Music")
How About
Biblical Authority?
There is one
translation of the word synagogues in the book of Psalms:
Thine enemies
roar in the midst of thy congregations; they set up their
ensigns for signs. Psalm 74:4
There is a
conspiracy
of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a
roaring lion ravening the prey; they have
devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious
things; they have made her many widows in the
midst thereof. Eze.22:25
They have cast
fire into thy sanctuary, they have defiled by casting down the
dwelling
place of thy name to the ground. Psalm 74:7
They said in
their hearts, Let us destroy them together: they
have burned up all the synagogues of God in the
land. Psalm 74:8
The people in
general did not worship at the sanctuary of God's
name, but normally in their own villages or homes.
The Living Bible translates verse 8:
"Let's wipe out
every trace of God," they said, and went through
the entire country burning down the assembly places where we worshiped
you.
Psalm 74:8LIV .
We noted that this
is a widely-used word for the synagogue above: Mowed (h4150).
Jesus and Worship
By adding the
"Lord's Supper," the synagogue could be used by the
early church. It had no priests as intercessors. "Essentially
democratic, the synagogue represents a fellowship of
worshipers seeking God through prayer and study."
(Britannica)
It simply is not
possible to add any "programs" to that task without
diminishing the Christ-ordained purpose for the
church of Christ.
This was "Spiritual"
worship in the mind or heart and devoted to truth. Jesus did not prescribe
usage for anxiety-creating rituals because He came to
take them off the backs of the lambs. He could not
parcel out His Word like a lawyer and still be the
Shepherd:
"Jesus did not Himself
prescribe public worship for His disciples, no doubt assuming
that instinct and practice, and his own spirit and example
would bring it about spontaneously, but He did seek
to guard their worship from the
merely outward
and spectacular, and laid great emphasis on privacy and real 'innerness' in it (Mt. 6:1-18)"
(The Int. Std, Bible Ency., Synagogue, p. 3111).
Alms:
Giving is not a
legalistic act. However, when we give in order to
further the church or to help the poor then our "act"
becomes worship. Why? Because we are "giving heed" to
the Word of God.
Giving was to be
voluntary as alms. However, the Jewish clergy often
sent people out to force you to give the leaves of the
mint or spices. Jesus outlawed controlled giving by
saying:
TAKE heed that ye do not your alms (compassionateness)
before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no
reward of your Father which is in heaven. Matthew
6:1
Therefore when
thou doest
thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before
thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets,
that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto
you, They have their reward. Matthew 6:2
But when thou
doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy
right hand doeth: Matthew 6:3
That thine
alms may be in secret: and thy Father which
seeth in secret himself shall reward thee
openly. Matthew 6:4
The Greek eklesia
was a body of like-minded people who always looked out
for their members. Giving by those with means to those
who are in need is both human and spiritual. The Greek ekklesia wa
much like a county court where mature males discussed
and acted on changes to the laws which they did not
make. However,
Paul denounced giving "as a commandment."
I speak not by
commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness
(speed) of others, and to prove the sincerity of
your love. 2Co.8:8
Prayer:
Paul did not command
prayer as an "act." Rather, he warned that one praying
a personal prayer in the presence of others must speak
understandable words. Therefore, he condemned prayer
in unclear languages. Prayer is to be in all places
and at all times. It was one of the two key features of the synagogue. Prayer
is personal and we all know that it is virtually
impossible to "lead" a group prayer except performing
a "ritual by rote." This 'leading' in the
institutionalized synagogue was reciting certain
formula prayers but they did not substitute for
individual prayers as seen in the case of Hannah.
The general rule,
but not for Jesus, was that the participants such as
the reader of the Word in the synagogue must sit. Therefore, Jesus
commanded:
And when thou
prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites (actors perform acts)
are: for they love to pray standing in the
synagogues and in the corners of the streets,
that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you,
They have their reward. Matthew 6:5
But thou, when thou prayest,
enter into thy closet (pantry), and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to
thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
Matthew 6:6
This is a DIRECT
COMMAND from the mouth of Lord Jesus. While others
might listen to our prayers we should use clear
language, there is no command, example or inference
that one liturgical performer can say a prayer in
place of the individual.
That thou appear
not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father
which is in secret: and thy Father which seeth in
secret shall reward thee openly. Mt.6:18
The brothers of
Jesus knew the "fame game." They said:
His brethren
therefore said unto him, Depart hence, and go into
Judaea, that thy disciples also may see the works that
thou doest. John 7:3
For there is no
man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself
seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these
things, shew thyself to the world. John 7:4
For neither
did his brethren believe in him. John 7:5
Someone has said
that "we begin to pray only when our mouth runs out of
words." This allows God to listen as our spirit speaks
for us. However, the pagans never ran out of words
such as "Lord, Lord."
And when you pray,
do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they
think they will be heard because of their many words. Matthew 6:7
The barbarians spoke in tongues or
their own minor dialects in public. However, Paul
outlawed it "in church" where everyone understood
the same language. These were never gibberish in an
approved sense but simply the approximately 70
minor dialects which the Greeks called TONGUES. The gibberish spoken
by the intoxicated pagan priestess was never
called a language or a tongue.
God knows what we
need and responds to prayer. However, it is vanity to
think that by harassing Him we can force an answer,
The earthly ruler must be importuned -- even the widow
must beg. However, God, our Father, feeds us without
making us beg.
Singing:
While Jesus did not
command singing as an "act," as a Jew observing
Passover, He sang one of the story songs called hallel
which was restricted to designated leaders for legal
festivals. Hymning was quiet and even silent reciting
certain Psalms and not sentimental poetry. Psalms,
Hymns and Spiritual Songs were all "the Word of Christ" in Colossians 3:16.
Singing was a "one another" practice to distinguish
it from the legal, Levitical performance for the worshippers.
However, the ancient changers were not timid about
restoring legal, Old Testament or even Pagan rituals:
The McClintock and
Strong Cyclopedia not only speaks, in general terms,
of 'heresy largely pervading the
church and making rapid headway' at that very time,
but it specifies 'the appointment of singers as a distinct class of
officers in the church' with 'the consequent
introduction of profane (not the Bible)
music' (Kurfees, M. C., Instrumental Music in
Worship, p. 123)
The modern appeal
for designated or trained singing teams is based upon
the fact that flawless, complex harmony has the
not-too-secret power to manipulate the mind of the
audience. This may be a denial of the power of prayer
and the Word of Christ given into the hands of the
elders of whom Paul commanded:
He must hold
firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can
encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those
who oppose it. Titus 1:9
Added:
The Lord's Supper:
Lynn Anderson,
keynoter for Jubilee 99 and author of Navigating the
Winds of Change shows how to move the Lord's Supper
into another musical performance. The method of change
agentry is this: Let the old folks have a quiet,
reverent Lord's Supper one week. Next week, those who
need to feel the music rather than to search out the
leaven in their own hearts can get a jab of
morphine-like endorphins to dull the pain and make
them feel spiritual. No doubt, in the long run, the
old rurals will loose and the urbans will win.
Jesus instituted the
Lord's Supper as a quiet, family meal of bread and the
fruit of the vine. This was not "crumbled off" bread
or sop dipped in bitter herbs. Part of the Passoveras
the context of the institution of the Lord's Supper
was a search of the house for leaven:
The search itself was to be
accomplished in perfect silence and with a lighted candle. To this search the
apostle may have referred in the admonition to
'purge out the old leaven' (1 Corinthians 5:7)
(Edersheim, Passover)
Corinth's assembly
was "doing more harm than good" (1 Corinthians 11:17).
Among other things, the two forms of worshipers
existed: by those who, in silence, searched out the
leaven in their heart, and by those who saw the supper
as a celebration. A component of the new wineskin
dogma is that worship means feeling the exhilaration. This is a form of
intoxication, perhaps on pure ignorance.
Perhaps only a few
understood the nature of the literal body of Christ
which He gave in death so that we do not have to die.
Paul said:
Wherefore
whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup
of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of
the body and blood of the Lord. 1 Corinthians 11:27
Unworthily does not mean that we
must be worthy. Rather, unworthy
means irreverently. Like the Passover where
the search for the house for leaven was conducted in total silence, those taking the Lord's
Supper must be quiet to search their own heart for leaven.
Because you cannot think about two things at the same
time, Paul made the Supper a personal time of reverence -- noise is never an aid
but a burden:
But let a man examine (test) himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and
drink of that cup. 1 Corinthians 11:28
For he that eateth and
drinketh unworthily (without reverence in
introspection), eateth and drinketh damnation
to himself, not discerning (separate
thoroughly, discriminate) the Lords body. 1
Corinthians 11:29
For this cause
many are weak and sickly among you, and many
sleep. 1 Corinthians 11:30.
It cannot be doubted
that those who need to sing during this period need to
shut out the process for others as well as themselves.
Music is always a way to discern ones own body and not
the body of Christ. No, that sweep of emotion is not
spirituality but just the opposite: it is an injection
of drugs. One "pastor" even wants to put LSD into the
communion juice because music is fine but drugs are
quicker.
We believe that the
Lord's Supper was a designated act at a designated
time to remember the Lord's Sacrifice. It, like
Baptism, was more than an outward symbol. Those who
refuse baptism refuse to come alive in Christ while
those who disrupt the Lord's Supper get spiritually
sick and die back to their old state.
Alfred Edersheim:
Sketches of Jewish Social Life by Alfred Edersheim
Chapter 17 Notes of the Synagogue which was
connected to the Temple grounds:
"Of theological lectures and discussions in the
Temple, we have an instance on the occasion when our
Lord was found by His parents "sitting in the midst of
the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them
questions" (Luke 2:46).
Edersheim
identifies three circles of sanctity: the first was the temple proper
into which not even Jesus could go.
Next, the grounds or precints
of the temple became the common gathering place
of the teachers
and disciples as a form of the synagogue.
Finally, what Paul
identified as "outside the camp" was the millions of
Jews attended "school" and prayer at the synagogues
while perhaps no more than 10 thousand of the
"sects" clustered around the Temple.
This would have
been the place in the "temple" where the early
disciples met.
"And it can scarcely
be doubted, that this also explains how the scribes
and Pharisees could so frequently "come upon Him," while He taught in the
Temple,
with their difficult and entangling questions, up to
that rejoinder about the nature of the Messiah, with
which He finally silenced them: "If David then call
Him Lord, how is He his Son?" (Matt 22:45).
"But in reference
to the so-called "Temple-synagogue," there is this
difficulty, that certain prayers and rites seem to have been
connected with it,
which formed
no part of the regular Temple services, and yet were
somehow engrafted upon them.
We can therefore
only conclude that the growing change in the theological
views of Israel, before and about the time of
Christ, made the Temple services alone appear
insufficient.
The symbolical and typical elements which
constituted the life and centre of Temple worship
had lost their spiritual meaning and attraction to
the majority of that generation,
and their place
was becoming occupied by so-called teaching and outward performances.
Thus the
worship of the letter took the place of that of
the spirit, and Israel was preparing to reject
Christ for Pharisaism.
The Sadducees were
generally in charge of the temple which from the
beginning had been the center of the civil state and
not the "church" of the people. The Pharisees had
taken over the synagogues in opposition to the
temple but when competition exists there is likely
to be abuses.
As for Jesus going
into the Synagogue Edersheim observes:
"And yet there was
nothing in the worship itself
of the synagogue which could have prevented either
the Lord, or His apostles and early followers, from
attending it till the time of final
separation had come.
"Readers of the New
Testament know what precious opportunities it offered
for making known the Gospel. Its services were,
indeed, singularly elastic.
For the main
object of the synagogue was the teaching of the
people.
"The very idea of
its institution, before and at the time
of Ezra, explains and conveys this, and it is
confirmed by the testimony of Josephus (Ag. Apion,
ii, 157-172).
But perhaps the
ordinary reader of the New Testament may have failed
to notice, how prominently this element in the
synagogue is brought out in the gospel history. Yet
the word "teaching" is used so frequently
in connection with our Lord's appearance in the
synagogue, that its lesson is obvious (see Matt 4:23; Mark
1:21, 6:2; Luke 4:15, 6:6, 13:10; John 6:59, 18:20).
The "teaching" part
of the service consisted mainly in reading a section from
the law, with which the reading of a portion
from the prophets, and a sermon, or address, were
conjoined.
The later rabbis
developed a law against "allegorizing." That is, the
sermon was simply the explanation of those portions
of the Scripture read and was often directed to
questions.
"Although the
sermon was
not an essential part of the synagogue service, the translation and explanation of the Scripture
lesson was a step in the direction of a preaching
service. There is evidence that an exposition of the
lesson formed a part of the Sabbath afternoon
service. In earliest times the sermon seems to have
been connected with the reading from the Prophets. Anyone able to instruct might
be asked to preach (Acts 13:15). The preacher spoke from a sitting
position on an elevated place (Luke 4:20).
(Feiffer, Charles F., Between the Testaments, p. 63
Baker Book House).
"Of
course, the liturgical element could in such services
never have been quite wanting, and it soon acquired
considerable importance. It consisted of prayer and
the pronouncing of the Aaronic blessing (Num 6:24-26)
by priests--that is, of course,
not by Rabbis, who
were merely teachers or doctors, but by lineal descendants of the house of Aaron.
There was no
service of "praise" in the synagogues.
There absolutely
was no instrumental music and the "singing' is
defined as the "way a school boy recites the
hallel." The fact that the synagogue was a school
and not a "temple" meant that any form of music had
no more rationale than a band in a Physics lecture.
"Early
Christianity inherited its musical practices and
attitudes from Judaism, especially from the Synagogue. Unlike the Temple the
Synagogue employed no instruments in its services
(Werner). The absence of instruments did not result
from antagonism toward instruments, whether the
instruments of the Temple or of the Hellenistic
cults, but from the simple fact that instruments had no
function in the unique services of the Synagogue.
"Public worship *
commenced on ordinary occasions with the so-called
"Shema," which was preceded in the morning and evening
by two "benedictions," and succeeded in the morning by
one, and in the evening by two, benedictions; the
second being, strictly speaking, an evening prayer.
* Our description
here applies to the worship of the ancient, not of the modern
synagogue; and we have thought it best to confine
ourselves to the testimony of the Mishnah, so as to
avoid the danger of bringing in practices of a later
date.
Jesus endorsed the
Shema which declared that there is only One God.
"Another act, hitherto, so far as we
know, unnoticed, requires here to be mentioned. It
invests the prayers just quoted with a new and almost
unparalleled interest. According to the Mishnah
(Megillah, iv. 5), the person who read in the synagogue the portion from the
prophets was also expected to say the "Shema," and to offer the prayers.
These prayers were
not improvized.
Lifting Holy
Hands
"The prayers were
conducted or repeated aloud by one individual,
specially deputed for the occasion, the congregation
responding by an "Amen." The liturgical service
concluded with the priestly benediction (Num
6:23,24), spoken by the descendants of Aaron. In
case none such were present, "the legate of the
Church," as the leader of the devotions was called,
repeated the words from the Scriptures in their
connection.
Prayers like the
reading was not mumbo-jumbo made up by non-bible
readers: it was reciting set prayers and was also a
form of teaching.
In giving the
benediction, the priests elevated their hands
up to the shoulders (Sotah, vii. 6);
in the Temple, up to the forehead. Hence this rite is
designated by the expression,
"the lifting up of
the hands." *
* The apostle may
have had this in his mind when, in directing the
order of public ministration, he spoke of "the
men...lifting
up holy hands, without wrath or doubting" (1 Tim
2:8). At any rate, the expression is precisely the
same as that used by the Rabbis.
Elsewhere,
Edersheim notes that only the High Priest could lift
his hands over his head.
In noting the
attitude observed in the prayers:
Suffice it, that the body was to be
fully bent, yet so, that care was taken never
to make it appear as if the service had been
burdensome.
One of the Rabbis
tells us, that, with this object in view, he bent down as does a branch;
while, in lifting himself up again, he did it like a
serpent--beginning with the head!
Any one deputed by the rulers of a
congregation might say prayers, except a minor. This, however,
applies only to the "Shema." [The shema was quoting a passage of
Scripture and was not spontaneous prayer].
It has already
been pointed out, that the main object of the synagogue
was the teaching of the people.
This was
specially accomplished by the reading of the
law.
The Sermon
"After each verse
an Aramaic rendering was given by an interpreter,
who in Palestine was bound NOT to use a written
translation and not to allegorize" (The New
Shaff-Herzog, Ency., p. 215).
Paul explained
this for the Christian churches
Knowing this
first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 2 Pe.1:20
Epilusis (g1955)
ep-il'-oo-sis; from 1956; explanation, i.e.
application: - interpretation.
Epiluo (g1956)
ep-ee-loo'-o; from 1909 and 3089; to solve
further, i.e. (fig.) to explain, decide: -
determine, expound.
Jesus and the
apostles further expounded the Scriptures once and
they are not subject to further expounding. This is
the meaning of allegorizing or "applicating" the
Word by taking a passage out of context and fitting
it to one's personal preaching or singing agenda.
The reading of the
prophets was often followed by a sermon or address,
with which the service concluded. The temptation to
ignore that which was written and invent their own new
commentary led Jesus to condemn the Pharisees.
The preacher was
called "darshan," and his address a
"derashah" (homily, sermon, from "darash," to ask, inquire, or discuss).
When the address
was a learned theological discussion--especially in
academies--it was not delivered to the people
directly, but whispered into the ear of an "amora," or
speaker,
who explained to
the multitude in popular language the weighty
sayings which the Rabbi had briefly communicated
to him.
A more popular
sermon, on the other hand, was called a "meamar," literally, a
"speech, or talk." These addresses would be either
Rabbinical expositions of Scripture, or else
doctrinal discussions, in which
appeal would be made to tradition and to the
authority of certain great teachers.
"For it was laid
down as a principle, that "every one is bound to
teach in the very language of his teacher."
Paul continued
this principle for the church:
He must hold
firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been
taught, so that he can encourage others by sound
doctrine and refute those who oppose it. Titus 1:9
The rule of the
synagogue for leaders was repeated by Paul. As the
elders were the "pastor teachers" in the synagogue,
Paul insisted that they be the preacher-teachers in
the local congregation. Those were to be recognized
according to Lenski who were "already laboring to
the point of exhaustion in preaching and teaching."
These men who were already fully devoted coluld,
like the Levites of old, given food or other help:
Let the elders that rule well be
counted worthy of double honour, especially they who
labour in the word and doctrine. 1 timothy 5:17
For the
scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox
that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is
worthy of his reward. 1 timothy 5:18
John Chrysostom agreed that this
is not "singing" but "preaching or teaching or
reading" the Word.
When Paul is said to preach in
English, he "dialogued" in the Greek:
"DIALEGOMAI
primarily denotes to ponder, resolve in one's mind; then, to converse,
dispute, discuss, discourse with; most frequently,
to reason or dispute with." In Acts 20:7 and 9 "the
A.V. (KJV) translates it 'preached,' this the R.V.
corrects to 'discoursed,' lit., 'dialogued,'
i.e. not
by
way of a sermon, but by a discourse of a more
conversational character." (Vine, p. 319).
"to say
thoroughly, i.e. discuss (in argument or
exhortation):--dispute, preach, reason, speak"
(Strong)
When Paul went into a settle
condition the assembly would be more like our Sunday
Schools than our worship service which makes a
deliberate effort to focus the congregation on the
celebrative preacher.
"Although the
sermon was not an essential part of the synagogue service, the translation and explanation of the Scripture
lesson was a step in the direction of a preaching
service. There is evidence that an exposition of the
lesson formed a part of the Sabbath afternoon
service.
In earliest
times the sermon seems to have been connected with
the reading
from the Prophets. Anyone able to instruct
might be asked to preach (Acts 13:15).
The preacher
spoke from a sitting position on an elevated place
(Luke 4:20). (Pfeiffer, Charles F., Between the
Testaments, Baker Book House, p. 63)
It appears that only
the females in some early churches tended to "stand
over" or become "non-sedantary." The males did not
stand over to enhance their authority. Therefore,
the "law against women" should be an unnecessary law
against men in theatrical performance.
Of Jesus,
Edersheim noted that:
"Similarly, the form also of His teaching was so
different from the constant appeal of the Rabbis to mere tradition; it seemed all to come
so quite fresh and direct from
heaven, like the living waters of the
Holy Spirit,
that "the people
were astonished at His doctrine: for He taught them
as one having authority, and not as the scribes"
(Matt 7:28,29).
In Fact, Jesus
insisted that the human flesh is not important. He
spoke only what He heard from the Father and could
say:
It is the spirit
that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the
words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and
they are life. John 6:63
Paul did not
command singing but teaching. To Timothy he wrote:
Till
I come, give attendance to reading,
to exhortation, to doctrine. 1 Timothy 4:13
There was no preaching
other than reading and often translating to "give
the sense" of that which had been read. "There was
no praise service in the synagogue" or the civil
ekklesia.
And
after the reading of the law and the
prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent unto
them, saying, Ye and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation
for the people, say on. Ac.13:15
Exhortation
is:
Paraklesis (g3874)
par-ak'-lay-sis; from 3870; imploration,
hortation, solace: - comfort, consolation, exhortation, intreaty.
Blessed is he that
readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and
keep
those things which are written therein: for the time is at
hand. Re.1:3
There was no praise service in
the synagogue.
Churches
moved into the synagogues
Therefore,
there was no recorded praise service in the
early churches.
The command
is not to "sing" but to teach. The singing and
melody is "in the heart." The word "speak" is
identical to the word "preach."
The word mistranslated as "church"
is the same as the Hebrew word for "synagogue. The
early Christians patterned their meetings after the
synagogue, not after the temple; so Christians would
not have used musical instruments, since nothing is
recorded about the Jews using instrumental music in
their ancient synagogues.
"In his book
Purity of Worship, the Presbyterian M. C. Ramsay
writes: "Those who maintain that Jewish worship had associated with it
instruments
of music fail to appreciate the facts; and
some of the facts are as follows:
"The ordinary worship of the Jew
was that of the synagogue, and it was always
unembellished.
"The men
of
Israel were commanded to attend the temple
worship only thrice annually.
Throughout the
remainder of the year, Sabbath by Sabbath, they
met for worship in their synagogues.
Their wives and children attended regularly the
synagogue where the services were marked by
simplicity....
"Where there was
congregational singing, there was no musical
instrument. ... It is both interesting and
informative to notice that the instruments of music
were first used in synagogues at the beginning of
the nineteenth century, that is,
about the same
time as they began to be introduced into
Protestant [i.e., Presbyterian] churches."
1 Tim 4:15 Meditate
upon these things;
give thyself wholly to them;
that thy profiting may appear to all.
G3191meletao
mel-et-ah'-o From a presumed derivative of G3199 ; to
take care of, that is, (by implication) revolve in the mind:--imagine,
(pre-) meditate.
G3199 melō mel'-o A primary verb; to be
of interest
to, that is, to concern (only third person singular
present indicative used impersonally it
matters):--(take) care.
Let the word
of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom;
teaching and admonishing one another
in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs,
singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord Col 3:16
Exhortation is:
Paraklesis (g3874)
par-ak'-lay-sis; from 3870; imploration, hortation,
solace: - comfort, consolation, exhortation, intreaty.
But he that
prophesieth (teaches) speaketh unto men
to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.
1Co.14:3
Doctrine is:
Didaskalia (g1319)
did-as-kal-ee'-ah; from 1320; instruction (the function or the
information): - doctrine, learning, teaching.
Take heed unto
thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them:
for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself,
and them that hear thee. 1Ti.4:16
And be not drunk
with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the
Spirit; Eph 5:18
Speaking
(preaching) to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs,
singing and
making melody in your heart to the Lord; Eph
5:19
Giving thanks
always for all things unto God and the Father in
the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; Eph 5:20
Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear
of God. Eph 5:21
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in
all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms
and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord. Col 3:16
Didasko (g1321) did-as'-ko;
a prol. (caus.) form of a prim. verb dao, (to
learn); to teach (in the same broad application):
- teach
And whatsoever
ye do in word or deed, do all in the name
(authority) of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to
God and the Father by him. Col 3:17
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own
husbands, as it is fit in the Lord. Col 3:18
The worship of the Jews was always blended
with paganism. For instance, many of the musical
instruments and musical terms are derived from Greek.
While the clergy tried to control the situation there
was always pressure from without and within to turn
the festivals ordained by God into entertainment
festivals where the "talent" of men and women became
the God. Where musical or performing talent is
involved in "religion" you have fertility rituals.
"During the fourth
century the Jews came under the influence of Greek Rationalism. In 332 BC Alexandeer
of Macedonia defeated Darius III of Persia and the
Greeks began to colonize Asia and Africa. The
founded city-states in Tyre, Sidon, Gaza,
Philadelphis (Amman) and Tripolis and even in
Shechem.
The Jews of
Palestine and the diaspora were surrounded by a Hellenic culture which some found
disturbing,
but others
were excited by Greek theater, philosophy, sport
and poetry. They learned Greek, exercised at
the gymnasium and took Greek names. Some fought
as mercinaries in the Greek armies.
"Thus some Greeks
came to know the God of Israel and decided to
worship Yahweh (Iao) alongside Zeus and Dionysus.
Some were
attracted to the synagogue... There they read
scriptures, prayed and listened to sermons
(explanations).
The synagogue was unlike anything
else in the rest of the ancient religous world.
Since there
was no ritual or sacrifice, it must have seemed
more like a school of philosophy, and many flocked
in the synagogue if a well-known Jewish preacher
came to town...
"By the second
century BC this hostility was entrenched: in
Palestine there had even been a revolt when
Antiochus Epiphanes, the Selucid governor, had
attempted to Hellenize Jerusalem and introduce
the cult of Zeus into the
temple....
"In the second
century BC Jesus Ben Sira...
made Wisdom (Sophia)
stand
up in the Divine Council
and sing her praises:
she had come forth from
the mouth of the Most High as the Divine Word by which God had
created the world... Wisdom leaving God to wander through the world in
search of humanity,
it is hard not
to be reminded of the pagan goddesses such as Ishtar, Anat and Isis, who
had also descended from the divine world in a
redemptive.
"When
monotheists fell in love with Greek philosophy,
they inevitably
wanted to try to adapt its God to their own." (Armstrong, Karen,
A History of God, p. 67f)
See how the Jews fell into Greek
worship with music and the gymnasium.
And See how Josephus warned the
Levites not to restore the music which had
destroyed the nation once.
Music in Reform Judaism
Music in the Synagogue:
Britannica Members
"The description
of the synagogue service above noted the role of the
hazzan, or cantor. It is he who reads the service and
declaims the
scriptural lessons to certain set musical modes that
vary with the season and occasion.
Many of these call
for melodic
responses on the part of the congregation.
The origins and varying developments of these chants
are ancient, often obscure, and equally complicated.
Whatever the basic materials, these were enlarged,
varied, corrupted, and reworked over the
centuries in the various environments in which the
Jewish communities have lived. In modern times
musicologists have begun to examine with great care
the history of synagogal music, analyzing its basic
structures and its relationship to the music of
Christian liturgical traditions.
In the 19th century in Western
Europe much of the traditional music was either discarded or re-worked under
the influence of western forms and styles.
In addition
the pipe-organ was introduced and was the centre of stormy
controversy.
A.D 1810-1815
"The strict order
of the Church Fathers that only one instrument
should be employed, i.e., the human voice, has been
observed in the Syriac, the Jacobite, the Nestorian,
and the Greek churches to the present day. So also
the synagogue did not use any instrument in the
services up to 1810, in which year the organ was
introduced in Seesen, Germany" (Idelsohn, quoted by
Bales , p. 259).
"The modern organ in Reform Synagogues
as an accessory of worship was first introduced by
Israel Jacobson at Berlin in the new house of prayer
which he opened for the Shabu'ot festival, June 14,
1815...(because this one was closed because errother
Jews brought suit) The members of the Reform party
succeeded in building and dedicating their first
temple on October 18, 1818, at Hamburg, where they
set up a fine organ, but employed a non-Jewish
organist" (Isadore Singer, Jewish Encyclopedia)
"It is still
banned by rigid adherents to old ways; but in
ordinary conservative congregations it is
unhesitatingly employed at weddings and other
services on week days" (Ibid., p. 134)
An attempt was
made by "Reform" Judiasm to export its heresies to Russia. Dr. Max Lillienthal
(1814-1882) set up the groundwork for
government-sponsored Jewish secular schools in
December 1841. However, his best-laid plans were put
to an end by the great Lubavitcher Chasidic
rabbi--thr Tzemach Tzedek. Generations afterwards
his discendent was was thrown down a flight of
stairs after the Russian Revolution. Reform Judaism
began in Germany just after the Napoleonic
emanicipation.
The synagogue
services were shortened, the vernacular and music
were used and group replaced individual
confirmation.
Political Reforms: Britannica Online
"Napoleon convoked a Sanhedrin
(Jewish legislative council) in 1807 to create a new,
modern definition of Judaism in its renunciation of
Jewish nationhood and national aspirations, its
protestations that rabbinic authority was purely
spiritual, and its recognition of the priority of
civil over religious authorities even in the matters
of intermarriage. In areas other than France, the
rationale for reform, at least in its early years,
was more aesthetic than doctrinal. The external
aspects of worship--i.e., the form of the
service--appeared unacceptable to the newly
Westernized members of the Jewish bourgeoisie in
both Germany and the United States, whose standards
of cultural acceptability had been shaped by the
surrounding society, and who desired above all to resemble their
Gentile peers. Thus, the short-lived temple established in
Seesen, by the pioneer German reformer Jacobson,
in 1810 enshrined order and
dignity of a Protestant type in the service
and introduced an organ, sermon, and prayers in German, in
place of Hebrew, to create an
uplifting spiritual experience.
The more radical
temple in Hamburg (established 1818) adopted all
of Jacobson's reforms and
published its own much-abridged prayer book, which
deleted almost all the references to the
long-awaited restoration of Zion. Reformers in
Charleston, South Carolina, introduced similar
changes in the synagogue ritual in 1824, for they
sought a non-national Judaism similar in form to
Protestantism and adapted to the surrounding
culture. It was apparent to the reformers that in
Western society Judaism would have to divest
itself of its alien customs and conform to the
cultural and intellectual standards of the new
"age of reason."
Israel Jacobson (1768-1828), a
Jewish layman, established an innovative school
in Seesen, Brunswick, in 1801.
There he
held the first Reform services in 1809,
attended by adults as well as children.
Jacobson's liturgy was in German rather than
Hebrew;
men and
women were allowed to sit together;
organ
and choir music were added to the service;
and Jacobson
instituted confirmation for both boys
and girls to replace the traditional boys' Bar
Mitzvah ceremony. The liturgy omitted
all references to a personal
messiah who would restore Israel as a
nation. Jacobson held Reform services in
Berlin in 1815; and from there Reform
practices spread to Denmark, Hamburg, Leipzig,
Vienna, and Prague.
The early church
added the Lord's Supper as a memorial of the death
of Christ and like the synagogue its task was
edification which is teaching the Word of Christ
in song and sermon. And like the Synagogue there
does not seem to be any rationale for
congregational or organized praise.
Both "stand
over" performance preaching and "team" singing is
a direct
violation of everything the Bible has to
say to us about the "assembly" which does not mean
"church" in the modern institutional sense.
See Edersheim's Full
Article
Church Index
Home
Counter added
8.02.05 7:30p 4.03.07 5546 5.15.07 7239
10.26.07 8973 12.06.07 425 2.15.09 14234 7.11.09
15922
5.25.11 25886. 4.3.19. 31291
www.perseus
<a
href="https://www.hitwebcounter.com"
target="_blank">
<img
src="https://hitwebcounter.com/counter/counter.php?page=7856685&style=0032&nbdigits=5&type=ip&initCount=0"
title="Free Counter" Alt="web
counter" border="0"
/></a>